World Trade Organization at a Crossroads: Reform or Irrelevance?
Countries are making headway in reforming the World Trade Organization (WTO), but a comprehensive deal is unlikely soon. Observers highlight the necessity for reforms to keep the 30-year-old trade watchdog relevant, while tensions rise over the consensus rule and Most Favoured Nation principle.
Efforts to reform the World Trade Organization are progressing, yet fall short of a comprehensive accord, according to a leaked document by Norway's WTO ambassador. The pressing need for reform is underscored by the deadlock caused by the organization's consensus decision-making rule.
In a document dated December 12, Petter Olberg, Norway's WTO ambassador, noted that a resolution on decision-making reforms is unlikely by the March 2026 ministerial meeting. However, he emphasized ongoing progress and urged ministers meeting in Yaounde, Cameroon, to create a forward-looking framework.
The United States criticized the stalled consensus system, warning it endangers the WTO's relevance as countries may seek alternatives outside the organization. A U.S. communication also proposed revisiting the Most Favoured Nation principle, underscoring the need for the WTO to modernize.
ALSO READ
-
Asia-Pacific Puts Services Trade at Centre of Growth and Jobs Through TS4D Talks
-
New Zealand Gives NZ$300,000 to Help Developing Countries Build Safer Food Trade
-
WTO Members Seek a Fresh Start on Farm Talks as Food Security Takes Centre Stage
-
WTO Sets Up Panel on EU Carbon Border Rules as Russia Challenges Restrictions
-
WTO at Crossroads: Why Future of Global Trade Matters to Every One of Us
Google News