Supreme Court's Bail Verdict in 2020 Delhi Riots Case: Mixed Outcomes
The Supreme Court denied bail to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam, citing a prima facie case under UAPA in the 2020 Delhi riots. However, bail was granted to Gulfisha Fatima and other activists. The riots led to 53 deaths and over 700 injuries, with seven people facing charges.
- Country:
- India
The Supreme Court on Monday denied bail to activists Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam, highlighting a prima facie case under the stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act related to the 2020 Delhi riots. The decision underscores the court's stance on handling cases involving serious offenses.
In a separate ruling, the court granted bail to activists Gulfisha Fatima, Meeran Haider, Shifa Ur Rehman, Mohd. Saleem Khan, and Shadab Ahmad, acknowledging nuances in the involvement of those accused in the riots that shook northeast Delhi, leaving 53 dead and over 700 injured.
The delay in the trial was noted, but the court emphasized that such delays don't override statutory safeguards. The detainees were charged under anti-terror UAPA and IPC provisions for allegedly being the masterminds behind the devastating riots.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
A Broken System: Justice Denied for Activists
Supreme Court Expands Definition of 'Terrorist Act' Under UAPA
Supreme Court Rejects Bail on Grounds of Trial Delay in UAPA Case
Supreme Court Delivers Mixed Bail Verdicts in 2020 Delhi Riots Case
Supreme Court Denies Bail to Activists; BJP Criticizes Congress Support

