US Seizes Power in Venezuela: Controversy and Consequences
In a bold move, the United States has captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, declaring plans to govern the country temporarily. The operation, led by U.S. Special Forces, has sparked international controversy. While some Venezuelans express relief, critics fear a dangerous power vacuum and echo past regime-change interventions.
The United States has taken a dramatic step by capturing Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, raising questions about its control over the South American country. President Donald Trump announced the development from his Mar-a-Lago resort, describing it as a bid for a stable transition.
U.S. forces conducted an overnight operation involving special forces, leading to Maduro's capture. Despite the seizure, Venezuelan government entities remain defiant, with Vice President Delcy Rodriguez calling for Maduro's immediate release, denouncing the incident as a kidnapping and maintaining that Maduro is the country's legitimate leader.
As the geopolitical tension mounts, Trump's administration has not clarified how it will manage Venezuela or who it plans to work with within the nation. The scenario has provoked mixed reactions globally, reminiscent of historic U.S. interventions and fueling debates on international sovereignty.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Geopolitical Waves: US Capture of Venezuelan President Shakes Oil Markets
Venezuela's Crossroads: After Maduro's Capture, Uncertainty Looms
Maduro Capture Sparks International Legal Debate: U.S. Faces U.N. Scrutiny
Concerns Mount for Indian Expatriates as US Captures Venezuelan Leader
U.S. Raid Captures Nicolas Maduro: Security Team Casualties

