Middle East Tensions: Risks of Nuclear Strikes on Iran

Israel aims to dismantle Iran's nuclear capacities without causing nuclear disasters. Strikes on facilities, such as those in Bushehr and Natanz, have raised regional contamination fears. Experts assert limited fallout concerns as major reactors remain intact. Gulf nations are particularly worried about water supply disruptions in case of any contamination.

Israel has intensified its military campaign against Iran, vowing to neutralize the nation's nuclear potential while avoiding catastrophic fallout in the oil-rich region. Recent strikes sparked alarms, notably in Bushehr, where the only Iranian nuclear power station resides. However, initial reports of damage were later retracted, illuminating the tension's volatility.

The conflict has seen Israel targeting multiple nuclear sites: Natanz, Isfahan, Arak, and Tehran, with a focus on halting Iran's alleged nuclear ambitions. These operations have damaged significant nuclear infrastructure, yet no radiation leaks have been detected. Expert opinions, like those from the IAEA, suggest strikes pose minimal radiological risks.

Concerns persist, especially among Gulf countries reliant on desalinated water, about potential contamination if serious damage occurs. With a high reliance on desalinated supplies, any impact could jeopardize critical water resources, highlighting the region's vulnerability to both direct strikes and downstream environmental impacts.

(With inputs from agencies.)