Uttar Pradesh Defends Madrasa Law Amid Constitutional Challenge

The Uttar Pradesh government is contesting the Allahabad High Court's decision to declare the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004 unconstitutional. The state, supporting the law, argues that it regulates madrasa operations to ensure quality education. A Supreme Court inquiry into the law's validity is ongoing.

In a recent development, the Uttar Pradesh government has affirmed its stance in defense of the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004, following an unfavorable verdict by the Allahabad High Court. The state maintains that the legislation is crucial for regulating madrasas and ensuring educational standards.

A bench led by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud, along with Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, raised concerns about the law's alignment with constitutional principles. During the proceedings, the Additional Solicitor General, K M Natraj, voiced support for the law, emphasizing its role in maintaining educational quality in madrasas.

The government argues against the high court's assertion of the law's unconstitutionality, claiming it does not breach fundamental rights or legislative competence. Meanwhile, discussions continue around the implications for students and the broader educational framework.

(With inputs from agencies.)