Judicial Morality: Beyond Popular Opinion
Former Supreme Court judge Abhay S Oka emphasized the need for judges to separate personal beliefs from legal duties. He advocated for decisions based on legal and constitutional grounds rather than societal pressures or traditional morality, highlighting the critical role of trial courts.
- Country:
- India
In an event organized by The Global Jurists, former Supreme Court judge Abhay S Oka underscored the importance of judges setting aside personal morality, religious, and political beliefs to uphold legal and constitutional principles. Judges, according to Oka, must execute their duties insulated from public opinion.
Justice Oka elaborated on how the judiciary should focus strictly on legal correctness, even facing public displeasure, while deciding cases. He cited examples where political figures have influenced public perception strongly, emphasizing that final judicial decisions should rest on evidence and laws, not political or societal pressures.
Additionally, Justice Oka criticized the terminology labeling trial courts as 'lower' or 'subordinate,' asserting that these courts are crucial venues where ordinary citizens can seek justice. His address highlighted the critical role played by trial and district courts in the Indian judicial framework.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Delhi High Court Sets Deadline for DMRC to Vacate Yamuna Floodplains
Constitutional Crisis: Punjab's Special Session Sparks Political Clash
Constitutional Clash: Punjab's Resolution Against VB-G RAM G Act
Supreme Court Urged to Address Urgent Environmental Issues
Supreme Court's New SOP: Streamlining Justice Through Timely Submissions

