Myanmar's Defense: ICJ Case Showdown on Rohingya Genocide Allegations

Myanmar challenges genocide accusations at the ICJ by Gambia, which cites atrocities against the Rohingya minority. Myanmar denies allegations, labeling its 2017 military action as counter-terrorism. The case has broad implications, highlighting international tensions and expectations for a ruling by 2026. Hearings include testimony from Rohingya victims.

Myanmar has challenged accusations of genocide against its Rohingya Muslim minority at the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Gambia, predominantly a Muslim nation, initiated the case in 2019, alleging that Myanmar's armed forces systematically targeted the Rohingya for destruction, forcing 730,000 refugees to flee into Bangladesh in 2017. Myanmar refutes these charges, asserting its military campaign was justified as a response to militant threats.

Ko Ko Hlaing, representing Myanmar, claimed Gambia failed to substantiate the allegations and accused the U.N. fact-finding mission of lacking objectivity. The ICJ, the U.N.'s highest court, is deliberating the case, with potential implications for future genocide rulings, including a pending case involving South Africa and Israel.

The hearings are set to span three weeks, including closed sessions with Rohingya victims of the alleged atrocities. The final decision, expected in 2026, could set legal precedents and influence other international disputes. Meanwhile, Myanmar faces internal turmoil, with criticism over the legitimacy of its current election process following a military coup in 2021.