Rajasthan High Court Revises Final Note in Landmark Transgender Rights Judgment

The Rajasthan High Court has modified its epilogue on a recent transgender reservation judgment, criticizing the 2026 amendment act for affecting the right to self-identify gender. Unnecessary portions were removed, affirming that self-identification is a right, not a concession. Policy frameworks must comply with the existing law, as of March 2026.

The Rajasthan High Court has revised the epilogue of its judgment on transgender reservation, addressing criticisms of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Act, 2026. The court highlighted that certain critical texts were not needed and have now been removed. This came after a request from the petitioner's counsel for clarification.

Three days post its March 30 ruling, the court maintained its stance on transgender persons being placed within the OBC category and reiterated that self-identified gender is constitutionally protected. The initial judgment had warned against legal and procedural barriers that might undermine trans rights.

While adopting a toned-down epilogue, the court emphasized that the right to self-identify is an intrinsic part of personal liberty. The revised order also directed the government to follow existing laws when drafting policies, ensuring substantial legal adherence.

(With inputs from agencies.)