Partisan Tides in Trump's National Security Decisions Stir Urgency

The Trump administration's Republicans-only briefing on U.S. strikes near Venezuela highlights growing partisanship in national security. Senator Mark Warner criticized the exclusion of Democrats, voicing concerns over safety and decision-making processes. The briefings raise questions on their legality and inclusivity, with demands for more transparency and bipartisan cooperation.

The Trump administration has sparked controversy by conducting a Republicans-only briefing on recent U.S. strikes against alleged drug vessels near Venezuela. This move, perceived as deepening partisanship in national security, has drawn criticism from Democratic leaders.

Senator Mark Warner expressed concerns, stating that politicizing military decisions jeopardizes service members' safety. He called for the classification of legal justifications for military actions to be reviewed, aiming for greater transparency and inclusivity, traditionally achieved through briefings involving both parties.

White House spokesperson Anna Kelly defended the actions, accusing Democrats of shielding foreign drug conspirators. Despite bipartisan briefings planned, the administration's approach has raised questions about the legality of the strikes, prompting proposed resolutions to limit unilateral military actions without congressional approval.

(With inputs from agencies.)