Simultaneous Polls Debate: A Constitutional Challenge

The first meeting of a Joint Parliamentary Committee focused on bills for simultaneous elections sparked a heated debate. Opposition MPs criticized the concept as undermining federalism, while BJP members supported it as aligning with popular opinion. Concerns over financial implications and constitutional integrity also emerged.

A vibrant debate unfolded during the inaugural session of a Joint Parliamentary Committee tasked with examining bills on simultaneous elections. The meeting witnessed opposition MPs denouncing the proposal as an assault on federalism, a cornerstone of India's Constitution.

According to attendees, Congress' Priyanka Gandhi Vadra challenged the assumption that holding simultaneous polls would significantly reduce election costs, questioning the government for evidence of such fiscal benefits.

Meanwhile, BJP members defended the initiative as a reflection of the populace's will, recalling historical precedents where simultaneous elections were held. As discussions progressed, concerns continued to swirl around the potential impact on regional representation and constitutional balance.

(With inputs from agencies.)