Supreme Court Proposes Fresh Evaluation for Senior Lawyer Designations
The Supreme Court has suggested a fresh evaluation process for conferring senior designations on lawyers in Delhi, following concerns of irregularities. This involves reconstituting a committee to reassess applications that were previously rejected or deferred, in accordance with the Indira Jaising judgement.
- Country:
- India
The Supreme Court has recommended a new evaluation process for the designation of senior lawyers in Delhi, following allegations of irregularities in the previous selection. A panel at the Delhi High Court will reassess applications that were rejected or deferred.
Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan requested senior advocate Rajshekhar Rao to seek instructions for conducting the exercise afresh. This decision emerged from a plea challenging the High Court's earlier designation of 70 advocates, including 12 women, in 2024.
The apex court emphasized the need for a thorough examination, expressing doubts about the adequacy of short interviews to assess candidates' suitability. The issue is to be evaluated further by Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna, with potential implications on the future designation process under the Advocates Act.
ALSO READ
-
Supreme Court Seeks Centre's Response on West Bengal Woman's Alleged Deportation
-
Supreme Court Greenlights Removal of Invasive Species in Delhi's Central Ridge
-
Supreme Court Grants Bail to Imaan Mazari: A Victory for Justice
-
Delhi High Court Demands Swift CBFC Decision on 'Mirzapur: The Movie' Song Controversy
Google News