Navigating Satire and Defamation: The Delhi High Court Case
The Delhi High Court examined a case involving BJP leader Gaurav Bhatia, addressing the need to differentiate satire from defamation on social media. Bhatia sought removal of posts showing him in a kurta without traditional bottoms, arguing it invaded his privacy. The court emphasized caution in such proceedings.
- Country:
- India
The Delhi High Court addressed a contentious issue on Tuesday, centering around the fine line between satire and defamation, particularly in the public sphere of politics.
Justice Amit Bansal highlighted the importance of handling such distinctions carefully while reviewing a case involving senior advocate and BJP leader Gaurav Bhatia. Bhatia's request stemmed from a social media event where he was portrayed in a potentially embarrassing manner during a TV appearance.
He claimed that related online content invaded his privacy, demanding its removal. The court scheduled further discussions for September 25, stressing careful judicial intervention in these matters.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Social Media Uproar: Arrest Follows Abusive Posts on Actress
Mumbai Police Clamp Down on Rogue Social Media Influencers Ahead of Civic Polls
Lalit Modi Apologizes Over 'Fugitives' Comment in Social Media Gaffe
Congress Leader's Social Media Post Sparks Controversy
New York Mandates Mental Health Warnings on Social Media
Google News