Jharkhand's Controversial 'Fake Surrender' Case Sparks Judicial Scrutiny

The Jharkhand High Court criticized the state government for submitting an affidavit by a junior police officer in a PIL concerning the alleged 'fake surrender' of tribal youths labeled as extremists. The court mandated a senior official's affidavit, highlighting implications of a policy from former Union home minister P Chidambaram.

Jharkhand's Controversial 'Fake Surrender' Case Sparks Judicial Scrutiny
  • Country:
  • India

The Jharkhand High Court expressed strong disapproval towards the state government after it submitted an affidavit from a junior police officer in a public interest litigation concerning the supposed 'fake surrender' of tribal youths mistakenly called extremists.

A division bench, led by Chief Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, insisted that such serious matters should involve affidavits from higher-ranking officials. The court has now instructed the Director General of Police to personally submit a detailed affidavit related to the issue.

The case alleges that tribals were falsely branded as Naxals as per a policy led by former Union home minister P Chidambaram, with a group of 300 Maoists having surrendered in 2014 in Ranchi. However, investigations revealed that several individuals were wrongly implicated, underscoring potential policy misuse.

Give Feedback

Use this form for editorial or site feedback. We usually reply within 2 to 3 working days.

By submitting, you agree that we may use your email address to respond.