Electoral Rolls Controversy: A Legal Roller Coaster

The Election Commission's special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls has been challenged in the Supreme Court. Senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi argues its legislative character and principles for voter registration. The debate covers constitutional roles, voter rights, and citizenship criteria impacting the electoral process.

The contentious special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls by the Election Commission has reached the Supreme Court, where senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi argues the decision is legislative and prescribed principles are nationwide, barring a specific exception in Assam.

The petitions, driven by the NGO 'Association for Democratic Reforms,' challenge the SIR's scope, debating constitutional provisions regarding voter registration and citizenship. Dwivedi argues that although voter forms and citizen proofs are required, presumptive validity is given based on lineage and previous rolls.

As debates continue, Dwivedi defends the EC's approach, rejecting claims of coercion and stressing no police involvement, while noting the relationship between Parliament and the EC under constitutional articles. The Supreme Court's judgment could reshape electoral governance and citizen verification practices.

(With inputs from agencies.)