Tulsi Gabbard's Contentious Path to Intelligence Chief Role

Tulsi Gabbard, nominated by President Trump for director of national intelligence, faces a challenging confirmation hearing. Lawmakers scrutinize her past pro-Russia comments and 2017 visit to Syria amid concerns about her qualifications. Despite lacking formal intelligence experience, Republicans largely back her as Democrats question her readiness for the role.

Tulsi Gabbard, nominated by President Donald Trump as the next director of national intelligence, is facing intense scrutiny in her Senate confirmation hearing. Lawmakers are dissecting her controversial past comments regarding Russia and a 2017 meeting with Syria's former leader, Bashar Assad, following his deposition.

The hearing is proving critical, as it will determine if Gabbard can alleviate bipartisan concerns about her qualifications and suitability for the role tasked with overseeing 18 national intelligence agencies. Critics highlight her lack of formal intelligence experience, which contrasts with the position's demands for extensive expertise.

Despite this, Gabbard enjoys increasing Republican support, with Sen. Tom Cotton endorsing her ability to streamline the office. In contrast, Democrats, led by Sen. Mark Warner, question her judgment and capabilities, casting doubt over her ability to execute the duties of such a significant national security role.

(With inputs from agencies.)