Court Upholds Fed Independence in Trump vs. Cook Battle
A U.S. appeals court has blocked President Trump's attempt to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook. The court's decision maintains the Fed's independence amidst allegations against Cook, which she denies. The White House plans to appeal, as implications for central bank operations and political interference remain high.
In a landmark ruling on Monday, a U.S. appeals court denied President Donald Trump's bid to dismiss Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook. This marked the first presidential challenge against the Fed's longstanding independence since its inception in 1913. The ruling comes amidst a heated legal duel over political control of the central bank.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued the decision hours before a pivotal Fed policy meeting where interest rate cuts are anticipated. The White House has announced its intention to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court. Trump's administration asserts that Lisa Cook was removed 'for cause,' a notion the court rejected based on due process grounds.
Judge Bradley Garcia, joined by Judge J. Michelle Childs, found Cook's constitutional claims likely warranted and emphasized procedural shortcomings in her dismissal. The ruling holds significant consequences for the Fed's autonomy, as maintaining distance from political influence is crucial for its effectiveness in managing inflation and economic policy.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Fed Independence Under Siege Amid Administration Pressure
Japan's Deep-Sea Mining Venture: A Bold Step Towards Rare Earth Independence
Japan's Bold Dive: Mining the Depths for Rare Earth Independence
Stocks Surge as Job Data Feeds Hopes of Steady Interest Rates
Trump's Controversial Call: A Cap on Credit Card Interest Rates

