Trump's Greenland Gambit: A Bold Move or Diplomatic Misstep?

U.S. President Donald Trump suggested acquiring Greenland to prevent Russia or China from gaining influence. Despite the existing 1951 military agreement, Trump believes ownership, rather than leases, offers better defense. His comments prompted criticism from European leaders, emphasizing Denmark and Greenland's autonomy over their own affairs.

In a bold geopolitical statement, U.S. President Donald Trump has articulated intentions for the United States to take ownership of Greenland to prevent its occupation by Russia or China. Trump emphasized the necessity of such a move during a meeting with oil company executives at the White House, underscoring the potential threats from the two global powers.

Despite Greenland's current status as an autonomous Danish territory with a U.S. military presence under the 1951 agreement, Trump argued that ownership is the only surefire way to guarantee the island's security. 'You defend ownership. You don't defend leases,' the President asserted, outlining plans being discussed within the White House to bring Greenland under U.S. control.

The proposal has triggered a diplomatic backlash, with leaders from Europe, including Denmark, voicing strong opposition. A joint statement from major European nations stressed the sovereignty of Denmark and Greenland in deciding their own future, highlighting that such international relations remain in their hands alone.

(With inputs from agencies.)