Undertrial Justice: Navigating the Trials of UAPA
Waheed Para, a PDP MLA, shares his experience of undergoing trial under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. He describes the exhaustive legal process as a punishment itself, citing numerous hearings and untried detentions across the nation. His remarks highlight the challenges faced by undertrials like him.
- Country:
- India
Waheed Para, a prominent People's Democratic Party (PDP) MLA, has criticized the process involved in trials under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) as a form of punishment itself. Para, who is currently facing trial under the UAPA, made these comments following his appearance at a fast-track Special Terror Court.
Highlighting his ordeal, Para detailed the demanding nature of the legal proceedings, mentioning enduring four years of trials, 60 hearings, and five witnesses. 'This is what justice looks like under the UAPA -- a law where accusation alone is a sentence,' Para stated in a post, pointing out the numerous individuals left languishing in prison without trial.
As Para navigates eight hearings in Jammu and Kashmir this July, he underscores that the judicial process often becomes a punishment in its own right, reflecting a broader issue faced by many under similar legal circumstances.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Supreme Court's New SOP: Streamlining Justice Through Timely Submissions
Justice for Anjel: A Call to Combat Racial Violence in India
Justice Sought for Anjel Chakma: A Tragic Loss
NESO Demands Justice and Safety for North East Students After Tragic Incident
Justice Mission 2025: Taiwan's Stand for Independence

