Federal Judge Blocks Trump's Health Grant Cuts Amid Pandemic Debate
A federal judge temporarily halted the Trump administration's plan to cut over $11 billion in public health grants. The ruling blocks the cuts during ongoing litigation, underscoring states' reliance on these funds for disease and mental health management. The dispute raises questions about pandemic priorities and funding authority.
A federal judge issued a temporary injunction against the Trump administration's proposal to cut more than $11 billion in public health grants. This move affects U.S. states grappling with infectious diseases and mental health services.
The decision by U.S. District Judge Mary S. McElroy in Rhode Island prevents the cuts from being implemented while the case proceeds. Democratic attorneys general from various states challenge the administration's authority, arguing that these funds were crucial for maintaining health programs.
New York Attorney General Letitia James criticized the cuts as illegal and damaging to state health systems. The Health Department justified the cuts as necessary, claiming the pandemic has ended. The funding in question supports COVID-19 responses, addiction treatment, and other health initiatives.
(With inputs from agencies.)
- READ MORE ON:
- Trump
- health grants
- cuts
- federal judge
- COVID-19
- litigation
- public health
- states
- funding
- grants
ALSO READ
Public Health Alert: The Complex Challenge of Obesity in India
Dr. Jitendra Singh Calls Obesity a National Public Health Priority at AOCO Inauguration
Air Pollution: A Rising Threat to Public Health and Economy
Wanxiang Settlement Concludes Decade-long Tariff Litigation
Tunisians Rise Against Pollution in Gabes: A Public Health Crisis Unfolds

