Supreme Court Seeks Siddaramaiah's Response in Election Challenge

The Supreme Court has asked Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah for a response regarding a plea challenging his election from the Varuna constituency. The petitioner claims Siddaramaiah indulged in corrupt practices through election manifesto promises. The court has issued notice to Siddaramaiah following a previous high court dismissal of the plea.

The Supreme Court of India has taken a significant step by seeking a response from Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah concerning a plea challenging his election from the Varuna assembly constituency. The petition, put forward by K Shankara, alleges corrupt practices in Siddaramaiah's electoral promises.

The controversy stems from the 'five guarantees' mentioned in the Congress party's election manifesto. The petitioner argues that Siddaramaiah's pledges constitute 'gratification to the electorate', a direct influence on voting, reportedly in violation of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. However, past verdicts have highlighted that manifesto promises are not considered corrupt practices under Section 123 of the Act.

The Supreme Court's involvement follows the Karnataka High Court's dismissal of the initial election petition. With the high court having sided with Siddaramaiah, the apex court's notice and intent to reconsider their 2013 judgment add a fresh layer to the legal debate on electoral promises and their implications.

(With inputs from agencies.)