Supreme Court Reprimands Allegations Against Esteemed Environmental Advocate
The Supreme Court censured Mukesh Jain for unfounded allegations against environmental advocate M C Mehta. Jain, accused Mehta of being funded by international agencies linked to the Naxalites, in a petition. The court emphasized Mehta's crucial role in evolving India's pollution laws, aiding pollution reduction efforts.

- Country:
- India
The Supreme Court issued a stern warning to Mukesh Jain, condemning his scandalous allegations against renowned environmental lawyer M C Mehta. Jain's petition claimed that Mehta received money from international organizations with Naxalite links, assertions the court found baseless.
A bench of Justices Abhay S. Oka and Ujjal Bhuya highlighted Mehta's pivotal role in shaping pollution laws in India, underscoring his extensive efforts since 1980. The court acknowledged that Mehta's actions have significantly contributed to pollution reduction measures that helped protect landmarks like the Taj Mahal.
Despite the gravity of the accusations, the court refrained from imposing penalties on Jain, citing this as his first offence. Jain's allegations arose during a hearing on the firecracker ban, where he controversially claimed that fireworks positively impact the environment.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Delhi's New Arsenal: Mist Sprayers Against Pollution
Supreme Court Enforces Strict Firecracker Ban to Combat NCR Pollution
Maharashtra's 'No PUC, No Fuel' Initiative: A Bold Step Against Pollution
Delhi's Battle Against Pollution: A Strategic Plan Unveiled
World's First Emission Trading Scheme: India's New Approach to Combat Air Pollution