Supreme Court Allows Judicial Officers Entry as District Judges
The Supreme Court ruled that judicial officers with seven years of prior practice as advocates can be appointed as district judges in bar-reserved vacancies. The judgement calls for changes to state rules, fostering competition and talent in the judiciary, potentially impacting recruitment nationwide.
- Country:
- India
The Supreme Court announced a landmark judgement allowing judicial officers, who have completed seven years of advocacy before joining the bench, to be considered for district judge positions reserved for members of the bar.
In delivering the ruling, the court highlighted the need for a dynamic interpretation of the Constitution, emphasizing that a rigid approach could stifle judicial excellence.
With the verdict's potential impact on judicial recruitment, state governments, in consultation with high courts, have been directed to amend relevant rules within three months to align with the judgement.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Defending Constitutional Values: A Call to Action by Maharashtra Congress
Controversial Bill Aims to Amend Indian Constitution's Preamble
Shaping Free Speech: The Supreme Court's Constitutional Journey
Germany's New Military Recruitment Plan: Boosting Defense Amid Rising Challenges
Controversy Over Police Recruitment Sparks Protests in Sikkim

