Meta's Legal Battle Over Children's Social Media Addiction Claims
A federal judge has denied Meta Platforms' attempt to dismiss a lawsuit filed by 29 U.S. state attorneys general. The lawsuit accuses Meta of designing Facebook and Instagram to addict children and misleading the public about the harm. The judge found factual disputes on the platforms' addictiveness and compliance with children's privacy laws.
A federal judge has refused Meta Platforms' request to dismiss a lawsuit from 29 U.S. state attorneys general. The lawsuit argues that Meta deliberately designed Facebook and Instagram to captivate children and concealed the associated dangers from the public.
Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers criticized Meta's compliance with the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act, granting the states a summary judgment on that issue. California Attorney General Rob Bonta declared the decision crucial in holding Meta accountable for exacerbating a mental health crisis among American youth.
The judge identified factual disputes over accusations that Meta's social media platforms are addictive and whether the company falsely claimed otherwise. A trial involving several states' claims against Meta is set for August 18.
ALSO READ
-
TikTok Settles Lawsuit Over Teen's Mental Health Impact
-
Courtroom Clash: Meta Faces Legal Heat Over Alleged Child Harm
-
Meta Faces Legal Battle Over Alleged Child Addiction to Social Media
-
Meta Faces Legal Challenge Over Alleged Child Online Safety Violations
-
Meta Revolutionizes Brain-Text Decoding with Brain2Qwerty v2
Google News